Saturday, December 30, 2017

OpenStack 12/30/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

OpenStack 12/26/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Friday, December 22, 2017

OpenStack 12/22/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

OpenStack 12/20/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

OpenStack 12/19/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Monday, December 18, 2017

OpenStack 12/18/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

OpenStack 12/13/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Monday, December 04, 2017

OpenStack 12/04/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Sunday, December 03, 2017

OpenStack 12/03/2017 (p.m.)

  • Tags: internet, Russia, BRICs, DNS

    • The Russian government is reportedly considering building an “independent internet infrastructure” that it can use as an alternative to the global Domain Name System, or DNS system.

      Last month, Russia’s Security Council asked the government to start building a backup DNS system citing “the increased capabilities of Western nations to conduct offensive operations.”

    • However, some defense experts say the move could “have more to do with Moscow’s own plans for offensive cyber operations,” according to the Defense One website.

      The alternative DNS would also serve the so-called BRIC nations — Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — and would operate independently of international organizations.

    • Russian president Vladimir Putin set a deadline of August 2018 to complete the infrastructure.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Wednesday, November 29, 2017

OpenStack 11/29/2017 (p.m.)

  • Tags: net-neutrality, FCC, Comcast

    • For years, Comcast has been promising that it won't violate the principles of net neutrality, regardless of whether the government imposes any net neutrality rules. That meant that Comcast wouldn't block or throttle lawful Internet traffic and that it wouldn't create fast lanes in order to collect tolls from Web companies that want priority access over the Comcast network.

      This was one of the ways in which Comcast argued that the Federal Communications Commission should not reclassify broadband providers as common carriers, a designation that forces ISPs to treat customers fairly in other ways. The Title II common carrier classification that makes net neutrality rules enforceable isn't necessary because ISPs won't violate net neutrality principles anyway, Comcast and other ISPs have claimed.

      But with Republican Ajit Pai now in charge at the Federal Communications Commission, Comcast's stance has changed. While the company still says it won't block or throttle Internet content, it has dropped its promise about not instituting paid prioritization.

    • Instead, Comcast now vaguely says that it won't "discriminate against lawful content" or impose "anti-competitive paid prioritization." The change in wording suggests that Comcast may offer paid fast lanes to websites or other online services, such as video streaming providers, after Pai's FCC eliminates the net neutrality rules next month.

Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Tuesday, November 28, 2017

OpenStack 11/29/2017 (a.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Saturday, November 25, 2017

OpenStack 11/25/2017 (p.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Friday, November 24, 2017

OpenStack 11/25/2017 (a.m.)

  • Tags: surveillance state, trackers, Android, apps

    • Researchers at Yale Privacy Lab and French nonprofit Exodus Privacy have documented the proliferation of tracking software on smartphones, finding that weather, flashlight, rideshare, and dating apps, among others, are infested with dozens of different types of trackers collecting vast amounts of information to better target advertising.

      Exodus security researchers identified 44 trackers in more than 300 apps for Google’s Android smartphone operating system. The apps, collectively, have been downloaded billions of times. Yale Privacy Lab, within the university’s law school, is working to replicate the Exodus findings and has already released reports on 25 of the trackers.

      Yale Privacy Lab researchers have only been able to analyze Android apps, but believe many of the trackers also exist on iOS, since companies often distribute for both platforms. To find trackers, the Exodus researchers built a custom auditing platform for Android apps, which searched through the apps for digital “signatures” distilled from known trackers. A signature might be a tell-tale set of keywords or string of bytes found in an app file, or a mathematically-derived “hash” summary of the file itself.

      The findings underscore the pervasiveness of tracking despite a permissions system on Android that supposedly puts users in control of their own data. They also highlight how a large and varied set of firms are working to enable tracking.


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Tuesday, November 21, 2017

OpenStack 11/21/2017 (p.m.)

  • Tags: Russia-Gate, censorship, Google, RT, Sputnik, litigation

    • Eric Schmidt, the Executive Chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet, says the company will “engineer” specific algorithms for RT and Sputnik to make their articles less prominent on the search engine’s news delivery services.

      “We are working on detecting and de-ranking those kinds of sites – it’s basically RT and Sputnik,” Schmidt said during a Q & A session at the Halifax International Security Forum in Canada on Saturday, when asked about whether Google facilitates “Russian propaganda.”

    • “We are well of aware of it, and we are trying to engineer the systems to prevent that [the content being delivered to wide audiences]. But we don’t want to ban the sites – that’s not how we operate.”

      The discussion focused on the company’s popular Google News service, which clusters the news by stories, then ranks the various media outlets depending on their reach, article length and veracity, and Google Alerts, which proactively informs subscribers of new publications.

    • The Alphabet chief, who has been referred to by Hillary Clinton as a “longtime friend,” added that the experience of “the last year” showed that audiences could not be trusted to distinguish fake and real news for themselves.

      “We started with the default American view that ‘bad’ speech would be replaced with ‘good’ speech, but the problem found in the last year is that this may not be true in certain situations, especially when you have a well-funded opponent who is trying to actively spread this information,” he told the audience.

    • RT America registered under FARA earlier this month, after being threatened by the US Department of Justice with arrests and confiscations of property if it failed to comply. The broadcaster is fighting the order in court.


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Friday, November 17, 2017

OpenStack 11/18/2017 (a.m.)

  • To secure your computer from infection with Trojan-Ransom, use the Application Control component of Kaspersky Total Security. Application Control logs the actions performed by applications in the system and manages the applications' activity based on the rules because Trojan-Ransom is a class of ransomware which blocks or limits user's access to the computer and demands a ransom to restore the system to its normal state. Do not fall in the trap Bog of viruses capitalize use our Kaspersky Toll-free number +1-855-676-2448.

    Tags: Kaspersky, Service, toll, free, number, tech, support


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Thursday, November 16, 2017

OpenStack 11/17/2017 (a.m.)

  • Tags: surveillance state, cybersecurity, software-vulnerabilities, U.S., transparency

    • The White House on Wednesday made public for the first time the rules by which the government decides to disclose or keep secret software flaws that can be turned into cyberweapons — whether by U.S. agencies hacking for foreign intelligence, money-hungry criminals or foreign spies seeking to penetrate American computers.

      The move to publish an un­classified charter responds to years of criticism that the process was unnecessarily opaque, fueling suspicion that it cloaked a stockpile of software flaws that the National Security Agency was hoarding to go after foreign targets but that put Americans’ cyber­security at risk.

    • The rules are part of the “Vulnerabilities Equities Process,” which the Obama administration revamped in 2014 as a multi­agency forum to debate whether and when to inform companies such as Microsoft and Juniper that the government has discovered or bought a software flaw that, if weaponized, could affect the security of their product.

      The Trump administration has mostly not altered the rules under which the government reaches a decision but is disclosing its process. Under the VEP, an “equities review board” of at least a dozen national security and civilian agencies will meet monthly — or more often, if a need arises — to discuss newly discovered vulnerabilities. Besides the NSA, the CIA and the FBI, the list includes the Treasury, Commerce and State departments, and the Office of Management and Budget.

      The priority is on disclosure, the policy states, to protect core Internet systems, the U.S. economy and critical infrastructure, unless there is “a demonstrable, overriding interest” in using the flaw for intelligence or law enforcement purposes.

      The government has long said that it discloses the vast majority — more than 90 percent — of the vulnerabilities it discovers or buys in products from defense contractors or other sellers. In recent years, that has amounted to more than 100 a year, according to people familiar with the process.

      But because the process was classified, the National Security Council, which runs the discussion, was never able to reveal any numbers. Now, Joyce said, the number of flaws disclosed and the


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

OpenStack 11/16/2017 (a.m.)


Posted from Diigo. The rest of Open Web group favorite links are here.